EDITORIAL STANDARD
How MainGame publishes automated casino content
Automation is allowed to move quickly; it is not allowed to invent facts. Every auto-published article must carry an evidence bundle, independent factual audit and deterministic quality pass.
Sources first
Primary sources such as Stake game pages, Stake release/statistics posts and provider release pages are preferred for game facts. Industry reporting can corroborate company news. X and other social sources are discovery signals, not sufficient proof for allegations or drama.
What earns a page
Exact-game pages are encouraged when there is enough verified information to answer real questions. The minimum is not a keyword count; it is evidence depth. Mechanics, release status, RTP, max win, provider context, franchise history, popularity signals and clear unknowns all add value.
Independent audit
The model that drafts an automatic article does not grade its own work. A separate fact-audit model receives the draft and the evidence bundle and flags factual claims it cannot support. After that, code checks length, sections, source references, disclosure, controversy corroboration and publication limits.
Corrections and updates
Living pages should become stronger when new evidence appears. Provider release dates, Stake availability and popularity are stored separately so later updates do not rewrite history. Unsupported specifications should be removed or labelled unverified rather than guessed.